|
A3: Yes, the following two alternative options were
examined,
a) Desiltation
b) Creation of multiple storages through
construction of small dams.
These
options are discussed below in detail.
Desiltation:
In Mangla reservoir, about 2 billion tons of silt has
already deposited and this is increasing at an average
rate of 57 million tons per annum. The volume of the
deposited silt is very huge and equals to 22 Mangla Dams.
Desalting of such a large scale has not been undertaken
anywhere in in world.
For desilting 2 billion tons of sediments, a huge fleet of
dredgers and barges will have to be deployed. In addition
22000 x 10 ton trucks will be required to work round the
clock for 5 years to transport the material to disposal
areas. Disposal of the huge quantities of the dredged silt
would be a major environmental hazard.
Additionally, 500 sq. km area would be required for
disposal of silt.
Estimated cost of desilting main reservoir would be around
RS.290 billion and the storage capacity gained through
desiltation would be 1.2 million acre feet. As such, the
unit cost of the capacity regained will be at least 10
times higher than that of Mangla raising.
Thus
the proposal of desiltation is both economically and
environmentally not viable.
Construction of
Small Dams:
Construction of small dams, wherever feasible, would
provide irrigation benefits to limited command areas, but
they cannot serve as an alternative to Mangla raising.
In addition, development of off channel reservoir at
Kasgumma which will draw water from Mangla reservoir
through a feeding tunnel was examined. The reservoir will
have storage capacity of 0.5 million acre feet and will
entail inundatin of about 1500 acres of very fertile land
and displacement of 5500 persons from 14 well developed
villages. In addition, unit cost of development would be
double the unit cost of Mangla Dam Raising. So the option
of small dams is not viable alternative to Mangla Dam
Raising. |